It’s March 2020, and many companies are facing the reality that the carefully crafted financial plans and
Furthermore, there is so much uncertainty in the business climate that it would be wise to run more than one forecast, to evaluate the impact of different scenarios on outcomes to find the best (or perhaps “least bad”) option. Time is of the essence and can make the difference between merely surviving a difficult period, capitalizing on competitive opportunities to come out ahead when it’s over.
This is stressful in any case, but the situation is made worse if you don’t have the right tools in place for your circumstances. In this blog post, QueBIT draws on its extensive experience in advising companies on their financial and operational planning systems, with 4 tips to help you make the best possible plan … to re-do your plan!
What do you need to know, who needs to be involved, and what tools will you use?
The big trade-offs are between “detail”, “quality” and “speed”.
If you have invested in a planning software platform, are using validated governed data, and have built good driver-based models that allow you to modify assumptions (such as headcount, productivity %, FX and interest rates etc), and can easily produce a P&L and cash forecast for different scenarios, then … CONGRATULATIONS! You are in good shape.
Here’s a decision table:
TOOLS |
Do NOT have the models needed |
HAVE the models needed |
Excel is our main planning tool |
See Tip 2 |
See Tip 3 |
We have planning software |
See Tip 4 |
All is well! |
What’s most useful to know, given limited resources? Assuming you feel like you are flying blind and need to get answers quickly, even if just at a high level, it is important to prioritize how you spend your time.
For example, if you have 4 business units, but 75% of your business comes from just one of them, just focus (initially) on that one.
Remember that more detail and complexity doesn’t always provide materially greater accuracy. When under time pressure, if you get an answer that passes the “reasonableness test”, it’s OK to go with it – at least on the first pass.
If Excel spreadsheets are all that you have to work with, take the time to apply some Excel modeling best practices. The web is full of good advice, for example this from Forbes.
If you are looking for other options, check out QueBIT’s blog post on Excel and State-of-the-Art Planning. Keep in mind that you can be up and running on a planning solution with working P&L, balance sheet and cash flow models in as little as 1 – 3 months, depending on your requirements.
If Excel is your main planning tool, and you already have models of your business that can answer questions like “what happens if physical store sales decrease by 50%, but on-line sales go up by the same amount?”, then everything may be fine.
The only caveat is if you have outgrown Excel’s capabilities. If you are not sure, ask yourself this question:
Am I spending more time collecting data, and/or emailing spreadsheets around … than on doing analysis to support making better decisions? |
If the answer is YES, then it is likely you have outgrown Excel’s capabilities. Your choices are to simplify your models, or to invest in a planning solution: both these options are explained in Tip 2 above!
If you have already invested in a planning software platform (other than Excel), and it is not meeting your current needs, then what should you do?
All the major planning software platforms are designed to have broad capabilities to support all the different ways businesses plan. It is therefore rare that the problem is due to a technical limitation (even if it might feel that way!)
Here are the 4 most common scenarios:
Scenario |
Description |
Model is incomplete |
The planning solution works well for what it does, but functionality is missing |
Model is “stale” |
At one time, the planning solution met the needs of the business but then the business requirements changed, and the model was not updated to reflect the changes |
Model doesn’t work |
The planning solution exists but adds no value |
Model might work, but I don’t know how to use it |
The planning solution is poorly documented, and I am new in this role |
For all these scenarios, the fallback measure is to use Excel to plug the gap. This may be adequate for your situation as described in Tip 3 above, but it is also an admission of defeat!
Here you are with the technological potential to perform quick and accurate what-if scenario analyses, share the data easily with decision makers, and increase the chances that your organization will not only weather the storm, but be in a position to grab opportunities that slower moving competitors cannot hope to capitalize on … and you are squandering it.
If you are not sure what to do, contact QueBIT. We have system healthcheck and training options that can get you on the road to productivity sooner than you might think!